Document review at scale
When a production runs to tens of thousands of documents, the constraint is disciplined human attention against a written protocol. We staff a reviewed team, code to your criteria, sample every batch for quality and escalate the calls that need a lawyer instead of guessing at them.
What the work involves
Review against your written protocol, or one we draft with you before the first batch.
Responsiveness, confidentiality and privilege coding with a documented escalation route.
Issue and hot-document tagging so the important material surfaces early rather than at the end.
Quality control by sampling each batch, with reviewer-level accuracy tracked and reported.
A daily or weekly progress and escalation report, whichever suits your matter.
What you receive
- Coded review batches to your protocol
- Privilege log preparation support
- Hot-document and issue reports
- Quality-control sampling report
- Progress and escalation reporting
Who it suits
- — Firms facing a large production on a fixed schedule
- — Regulatory and internal investigation responses
- — Second-level review and privilege-log preparation
What we do not do
We do not license, host or operate a review platform — we work inside yours
No predictive coding, analytics or technology-assisted review claims
No digital forensics, collection or data processing
Final privilege determinations remain with counsel
Turnaround
Scoped per matter against volume and deadline; a staffing and throughput plan is confirmed in writing before the first batch.
Standard turnaround is three to five working days for a research, chronology or summary packet, with rush handling available on written confirmation. Larger review projects run to a schedule agreed before work starts.
How the engagement runs
01 · Enquiry
Every enquiry is logged and acknowledged within two working days.
02 · Scoping
Objectives, deliverables, timeline and constraints are documented in a written Scope Note.
03 · Proposal
A written proposal within three working days — scope, methodology, timeline and fee.
04 · Agreement
A Master Confidentiality and Project Agreement is executed before any work begins.
05 · Research & Drafting
Carried out by a named analyst under the OASIS Dual Verification Standard — significant claims verified across independent sources.
06 · Two-Round Internal Review
An independent accuracy review, then an editorial quality review, before anything is delivered.
07 · Delivery
Delivered on the agreed date with a delivery note confirming internal clearance.
08 · Revisions & Payment
One included revision round; final files released on payment (standard 14 days).
09 · Closure & Archive
All project materials archived securely under our records retention policy.
Questions we are asked
- Do we need to provide the review platform?
- Yes. Our reviewers work inside your environment with the access your team grants, which keeps the data under your control and your security policy.
- How is quality measured?
- By sampling coded documents in every batch and reporting accuracy per reviewer, with re-review of any batch that falls below the threshold agreed at the outset.
Related services
Contract review and abstraction
Contract portfolios reduced to a structured register — key dates, obligations, clause positions and deviations from your playbook.
Deposition and record summaries
Transcripts and record sets reduced to the format you actually use at trial — page-line, topical or narrative — with contradictions tabled.
Litigation research and drafting
Research memoranda, motion and brief drafts and case-law surveys, prepared with inline citations for counsel's review and signature.
OASIS is a research and drafting provider, not a law firm. We do not give legal advice, do not represent clients and do not enter into attorney–client relationships. All work product is reviewed and adopted by admitted counsel, who retain full professional control of the matter.